Nancy DeMoss Wolgemuth is so undiscerning she can’t recognize pagan witchcraft & heretical teachers
Nancy DeMoss Wolgemuth is someone we have called out before for teachings which harm victims of abuse and for promoting ESS, the false doctrine of Eternal Submission of the Son. I have just found out that she is dangerous in other ways as well. This is no surprise to me. If someone has a faulty doctrine of the Trinity, and if they are unable to teach in a way that does not endanger victims of domestic abuse, they are most likely to be ‘off’ in other ways as well. Here are the two things I have found. Full documentation is given in the links.
1. Nancy mixes Witchcraft Circle-Making with Christianity
At Pulpit and Pen, the article Nancy Leigh DeMoss Wolgemuth Mixes Pagan Witchcraft Circle-Making With Christianity gives detailed documentation proving that Nancy DeMoss (now Wolgemuth) was standing and praying with other women in a circle drawn on the platform, and that Nancy has endorsed the so-called evangelist named Rodney “Gipsy” Smith. It is important to know that “Gypsy” Smith taught the circle-drawing practice to Christians while being fully aware that the practice derived from gypsy witchcraft. Read the above link for further info about that witchcraft practice and how it has crept into ‘c’hristian circles.
On the broadcast Inside This Circle (Revive our Hearts, Seeking Him Radio), Nancy says:
Gypsy Smith was a nineteenth-century revivalist who did something unusual when he came to a new town. He’d stop on the outskirts and draw a circle in the dirt. Then he would stand inside that circle and say, “O God, please send a revival to this town, and let it begin inside this circle.
2. Nancy is so undiscerning that she has quoted Richard Foster, without warning her readers that he is a gnostic heretic.
The Pulpit and Pen article pointed to an article at ApprisingMinistries which documents another problem with Nancy DeMoss Wolgemuth’s doctrine and level of discernment. That article, Nancy Leigh DeMoss Turns Readers to Richard Foster for Guidance, demonstrates that Nancy was approvingly quoting from Richard Foster who is gnostic and teaches the heretical doctrines and practices of ‘contemplative Christianity’ and who is strongly influenced by eastern pagan religions and Roman Catholicism.
I followed the links given in that article about Nancy endorsing Richard Foster. I found that on Nancy’s website Revive Our Hearts, she has a transcript of her talk Potential Pitfalls of Servanthood. It’s obvious, reading that transcript and comparing it with what was quoted on the Apprising Ministries article, that Nancy or her minders have now removed the bit where she approvingly quoted from Richard Foster. But in the comments thread on her transcript, some of the commenters reproved her for having quoted Foster — so it’s without doubt that she had originally quoted Foster.
Despite Nancy scrubbing her Foster quote, she made no admission of fault or apology to her readers. She just scrubbed the quote from Foster. It is typical of false teachers to just scrub their ‘mistakes’ but never admit fault or publicly apologize.
If Nancy later realized that Richard Foster is a false teacher, and it was not wise of her to have quoted him so approvingly, why didn’t she then warn her readers that Foster is dangerous?
I am so thankful that I was in the New Age before I came to Christ. It made me hyper-vigilant to pagan ideas infecting in the church. After I became a Christian and had a good grounding in Christian doctrine, I did a lot of research into many branches of paganism and satanic and gnostic teaching. That research, coupled with my previous experience in the New Age, has helped me recognize the red flags. So many Christian are ignorant about these red flags.
I am thankful for Rachel Miller’s post Does It Matter What Women Are Taught? on which the commenter, NJ, pointed to the article “Nancy Leigh DeMoss Wolgemuth Mixes Pagan Witchcraft Circle-Making With Christianity”. This is an example of the true body of Christ helping each other to
- stay awake and alert
- keep oil in our lamps
- not neglect to fellowship together, especially as the day approaches.
(Matt 26:40-45; Heb 10:25; Matt 24:42; 25:1-13)
Rachel Miller’s post gives more proof that Nancy teaches ESS. And Rachel brilliantly applies what Aimee Byrd says in her new book, No Little Women, to show how Nancy’s teaching is dangerous.
If you’ve never commented on this blog before it is important to read our New Users’ Info page because it gives tips for how to guard your safety while commenting on the blog. And if you’re new to this blog we encourage you look at our FAQs. The New Users Info page and the FAQs can also be found on the top menu bar.
TRUE WOMAN 101: DIVINE DESIGN – a review by Rachel Miller (shows how Nancy teaches ESS, the aberrant doctrine of the Eternal Subordination of the Son)
Does it Matter What Women Are Taught? by Rachel Miller